kyle021 Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 We have several immediate needs at RG, DE, WR and CB we have upcoming needs at OLB, TE, RB, C, CB, and potentially QB. I think the best move in a draft rich with defensive talent is to trade back with a team like Oakland to pick 24 or 27 or NE to pick 32 and accumulate an extra second rounder this year and third next year. Ideally we trade back from 19 to 27 and pick up a second rounder from Oakland and a 3rd next gear while giving them our 5th next year this puts us in position to grab a CB like Murphy, Williams or Baker at 27, a DL and RG in 2 and OLB in 3 and WR in 4 i just posted about CB depth and how we only have two players under contract after this year. Byron Murphy is an absolute stud and can play any scheme. If we traded back I would take him in a heartbeat and settle for Saunders and McGovern in round 2 and an OLB like Polite in 3 and a WR in 4 it also gives us flexibility going into next year having an extra 3rd to use that in a package to move up for a QB if need be or to move up for a different player if QB is settled We can trade back from 19 to 27 or 32 and get an equal value player at DL, TE or OL. However I would prefer a lockdown CB to take over for Ryan and Sims next year and to have our two 2nd rounders and 3rd rounder to lock down the OG, DT and OLB needs while we could get a WO like Emmanuel Hall in round 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ctm Posted April 23, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Thursday can't get here fast enough. JMoney420, woolfolksunclesuncle, Bluth, and 12 others 15 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Great. I'm sure we're the only team looking to trade back so we should have MANY suitors who are after the coveted 19 Justafan, and JMoney420 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleytolar Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 36 minutes ago, Kyle021 said: We have several immediate needs at RG, DE, WR and CB we have upcoming needs at OLB, TE, RB, C, CB, and potentially QB. So Kickers in 2021 and Tackles in 2022? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamlngEnvy Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Funny this comes out like hours after jrob says he wishes he had more picks interesting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 20 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: We are no longer the team that needs to trade back to stock the pond. We need playmakers. My first time agreeing with Jake. woolfolksunclesuncle, prometheus, Titan8425, and 1 other 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nine Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 The problem with trading down is that it requires a partner who wants to trade up. This class has a lot of quality prospects...but IMO, the drop-off in talent from #19 to #32 isn’t bad. Rather than sacrificing a 3rd to jump up maybe 10-12 spots, I suspect teams will be content to keep their picks and let the draft come to them. wiscotitansfan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DallasTitan Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 I am tending to agree with Kyle! Trading back may be our best choice! Not sure a guy we desire will be there at 19 and going back a few slots gets us same player with additional assets! agree we need playmakers but if need to insure we get most as well as player we desire Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) I can see a decent amount of action for pick 19 if we want to trade down. Way easier to trade that pick than the 5th pick. Edited April 23, 2019 by japan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharrdWood Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 4 minutes ago, japan said: I can see a decent amount of action for pick 19 if we want to trade down. Way easier to trade that pick than the 5th pick. I can't see trading 19. It would have to be a helluva haul. To me this draft is top-heavy and the Titans should pick BPA there unless some team blows their minds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrill Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 6 minutes ago, japan said: I can see a decent amount of action for pick 19 if we want to trade down. Way easier to trade that pick than the 5th pick. I think we’d have to trade into the top of the 2nd round. I think those are picks people are more willing to trade up from. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle021 Posted April 23, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 3 hours ago, 52O said: Funny this comes out like hours after jrob says he wishes he had more picks interesting He did? Link? I want to read it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleEye Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Kyle021 said: He did? Link? I want to read it 5:53 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 Obviously more picks is advantageous but I think the meat of the draft is on day 2 beyond the first 15-20 top prospects. charleytolar 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakingeek Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 15 hours ago, JakePA_Titan said: We are no longer the team that needs to trade back to stock the pond. We need playmakers. For once I actually agree with you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.