Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 4/24/2019 at 8:50 AM, Rolltide said:

Oilerman has to be the dumbest most inaccurate poster in the history of this site or Gotitans. Every single thing he has said is stupid wrong. Not just wrong stupid wrong. 

 

Anybody who thinks Adam Schiff is a brilliant patriot and not some ultra partisan ass is a moron. 

Unless he is talking about Mariota, I agree. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OILERMAN   

I know you Trumpers don't give a damn about facts or Trump's criminality but the no collusion no obstruction claim is completely false. 

 

Mueller laid out the fact "Collusion" is not a legal term in the report. Mueller was looking for a direct link/agreement that he could find between Trump and the Russian government that reached conspiracy(the real crime) Mueller determined that he couldn't find enough evidence to charge him on conspiracy but added Manafort's reluctance to corporate and the fact the campaign deleted conversations. There were also secret meetings and attempts to create back channels(Kushner). There were 140 meetings between Trump's campaign and Russia while Russia was interfering in the election. All this while claiming they never talked to Russia and there were no talks of a Trump tower in Moscow. 

 

The idea the Mueller report cleared Trump on Collusion is laughable. Yay! Mueller couldn't find an actual agreement with Trump and Russia to conspire despite loads of evidence of a coordinated effort between the parties, a laughably low standard! Mueller also said it was hard to put a value on the help Russia gave which would have been illegal if something of value was given to a campaign from a foreign government. 

 

As for the obstruction, he's guilty clear as day. All the firings and attempted firings and lies about the motives are clear cut. Only the fact a sitting president can be indicted is why he's not charged, just like the payoff to Stormy Daniels, he would have multiple felonies. He's got up to 10 instances or criminal obstruction. 

 

Trump hired Barr to spin the report to the public. It worked to a degree before somewhat back firing. 

 

Now Trump has to try and delay and stop public testimony before the house. The public as a whole is uninformed on the actual info in the Mueller report but multiple public hearing would be devastating to Trump politically. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rolltide   

When is Oilerman going to start taking his medication and stop this delusion about Trump in hand cuffs or resigning in disgrace?

 

It is not going to happen! You will need to defeat him in an election to get him out of office and that will not happen either.  

 

Your dream of a Mike Pence presidency will have to be on hold for another 6 years.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rolltide   
9 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

I know you Trumpers don't give a damn about facts or Trump's criminality but the no collusion no obstruction claim is completely false. 

 

Mueller laid out the fact "Collusion" is not a legal term in the report. Mueller was looking for a direct link/agreement that he could find between Trump and the Russian government that reached conspiracy(the real crime) Mueller determined that he couldn't find enough evidence to charge him on conspiracy but added Manafort's reluctance to corporate and the fact the campaign deleted conversations. There were also secret meetings and attempts to create back channels(Kushner). There were 140 meetings between Trump's campaign and Russia while Russia was interfering in the election. All this while claiming they never talked to Russia and there were no talks of a Trump tower in Moscow. 

 

The idea the Mueller report cleared Trump on Collusion is laughable. Yay! Mueller couldn't find an actual agreement with Trump and Russia to conspire despite loads of evidence of a coordinated effort between the parties, a laughably low standard! Mueller also said it was hard to put a value on the help Russia gave which would have been illegal if something of value was given to a campaign from a foreign government. 

 

As for the obstruction, he's guilty clear as day. All the firings and attempted firings and lies about the motives are clear cut. Only the fact a sitting president s why he's not charged, just like the payoff to Stormy Daniels, he would have multiple felonies. He's got up to 10 instances or criminal obstruction. 

 

Trump hired Barr to spin the report to the public. It worked to a degree before somewhat back firing. 

 

Now Trump has to try and delay and stop public testimony before the house. The public as a whole ia uninformed on the actual info in the Mueller report but multiple public hearing would be devastating to Trump politically. 

 

 

The ultimate example of obstruction is hiding or destroying evidence that has been suboenaed. Trump never did that but Hillary did it 2X with the Rose law firm documents and the emails. Might need to learn the definition of the world obstruction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jamalisms said:

But Hillary!

Right.

 

It's funny ppl look to deleted texts and make that a smoking gun while Hillary destroying evidence was shit on by the same ppl.

 

Who didnt care about facts @OILERMAN?

 

Oh let me guess, if she's guilty, lock her up right?

 

Ok, right back at you. Go slap some metal on Trumps wrists. I'm waiting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OILERMAN   
15 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

 

 

Who didnt care about facts @OILERMAN?

 

Oh let me guess, if she's guilty, lock her up right?

Investigated and cleared, she would have been an outlier had she been indicted over the e-nails. Half the Trumps have done the same.

 

Trey Gowdy said they found nothing criminal with Bhenghazi.

 

When the Republicans controlled all 3 branches they did no oversight, the AG said there was no evidence.

 

Where is the crime?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

Investigated and cleared, she would have been an outlier had she been indicted over the e-nails. Half the Trumps have done the same.

 

Trey Gowdy said they found nothing criminal with Bhenghazi.

 

When the Republicans controlled all 3 branches they did no oversight, the AG said there was no evidence.

 

Where is the crime?

 

Where is the crime in deleting texts?

 

Where is the crime of collusion. Oh wait, I guess "conspiracy"?

 

You have obstruction, right? Why doesnt your all talk no substance party go for that impeachment they riled their base up about for 3 years?

 

Impeach 45!

 

Get the fuck on it. 

Edited by JakePA_Titan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OILERMAN   
Just now, JakePA_Titan said:

Where is the crime in deleting texts?

 

Where is the crime of collusion. Oh wait, I guess "conspiracy"?

 

You have obstruction, right? Why doesnt your all talk no substance party go for that impeachment they rioted their base up about for 3 years?

 

Impeach 45!

 

Get the fuck on it. 

Why didn’t the Republicans indict or investigate more?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...