OILERMAN Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 Trump's lawyers are preparing a rebuttal for the obstruction portion of the report. Sounds like McGahn could have told Mueller some bad stuff concerning firing Comey and attempting to fire Comey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-officials-concerned-about-being-exposed-mueller-report-n994861 thor 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 12 minutes ago, Justafan said: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-officials-concerned-about-being-exposed-mueller-report-n994861 It's crystal clear Trump obstructed and the WH lawyers that cooperated clearly backed that up to Mueller. Another problem is this has no grand jury testimony and no classified info. I'm sure that's why Barr added in anything that would be embarrassing can also be redacted. It's also obvious this is being released the day before good Friday to try and down play it. I'm fairly confident Barr will cover for these guys SpLeEnBeAnS, Justafan, and thor 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeFan Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Justafan said: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-officials-concerned-about-being-exposed-mueller-report-n994861 Not one name of a person who gave the information. You would think by now you would have learned your lesson. Keep the delusion going!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 58 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: It's crystal clear Trump obstructed and the WH lawyers that cooperated clearly backed that up to Mueller. Another problem is this has no grand jury testimony and no classified info. I'm sure that's why Barr added in anything that would be embarrassing can also be redacted. It's also obvious this is being released the day before good Friday to try and down play it. I'm fairly confident Barr will cover for these guys LOL! According to you it was crystal clear Trump was in collusion with the Russians. It was just a matter of time. thor 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Little Earl said: According to you it was crystal clear Trump was in collusion with the Russians. It was just a matter of time. It was, not charging(Which DOJ policy says they can't do anyway) Trump with a crime doesn't mean he didn't do it. thor 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Soxcat said: Don't these libtards get it? There can't be anything of substance on obstruction. Trump didn't obstruct the investigation. Ummm... you do understand the Mueller investigation wasn’t started to see if Trump had obstructed the Mueller investigation, right? thor 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, Soxcat said: The report was emphatic there was no collusion. No it wasn’t. It hasn’t even been released yet. Only Barr's summary. All we know is Barr said that Mueller said he didn’t have enough to establish a legal case against Trump. That doesn’t mean they didn’t collect plenty of evidence of collusion (which we already know exists). Just that it’s not enough to make their case. OILERMAN, and thor 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 21 minutes ago, Soxcat said: The report was emphatic there was no collusion. Barr, Trump and the media machine have been incredibly effective. They only have to give you guys a few yards of rope and you'll go round the barn 10 times screaming libtards all the way. Hilarious. Starkiller, OILERMAN, and thor 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 5 hours ago, Soxcat said: The report was emphatic there was no collusion. Bang your head against a wall until you destroy that Adam Shit part of your brain. But we should really look at the complete hypocrisy here shouldn't we? As in despite the fact it was OBVIOUS Hillary was guilty but wasn't charged that was the standard for libtards then. In fact narrowly avoiding prosecution has always been the standard that a Dem didn't do anything wrong. It has already been pointed out how Starkiller clears the Clintons of any wrong doing in Whitewater, because they didn't get convicted. Of course with Trump it was said there was NO evidence, while with the Clintons there was INSUFFICIENT evidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 5 hours ago, Soxcat said: The report was emphatic there was no collusion. I am keeping an open mind until we all see the redacted report, but this statement is complete Trump nut hugging BS. You read the report? You know someone impartial who has? If not...you are full of shit. OILERMAN, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Little Earl said: It has already been pointed out how Starkiller clears the Clintons of any wrong doing in Whitewater, because they didn't get convicted. Of course with Trump it was said there was NO evidence, while with the Clintons there was INSUFFICIENT evidence. There is a lot of evidence against the Trump campaign. And that’s before we see the Mueller report. Mueller just decided there isn’t enough to make a solid case against Trump himself. As for the Clintons, Starr didn’t find anything on Whitewater to go after them with. What evidence did he present in his report? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted April 16, 2019 Report Share Posted April 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Little Earl said: It has already been pointed out how Starkiller clears the Clintons of any wrong doing in Whitewater, because they didn't get convicted. Of course with Trump it was said there was NO evidence, while with the Clintons there was INSUFFICIENT evidence. Actually, in one case with the clintons, the statute of limitations had run out on the Whitewater case. If the billing records hillary hid in the White House had been presented as evidence, NOBODY would have believed her testimony about the "minimal" hours worked on the case. And she knew it, and that's why they were kept hidden until it was too late. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btowner Posted April 17, 2019 Report Share Posted April 17, 2019 13 hours ago, OILERMAN said: It's also obvious this is being released the day before good Friday to try and down play it. I'm fairly confident Barr will cover for these guys Justafan, MadMax, thor, and 2 others 3 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted April 17, 2019 Report Share Posted April 17, 2019 Btowner, thor, ChemEngr79, and 2 others 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.