Titans279 Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 Re: Kamala floundering There’s still 9 months with 6 TV debates before the first primary. Lots of time for anyone to win. Kamala and Beto still have lower name ID than Bernie or Biden. No1TitansFan, and Legaltitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 2 hours ago, Legaltitan said: how so? I'll start a new thread so the discussion doesn't derail this one and get buried here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 In the same poll Bernie’s favorables are dropping. I expect Biden will drop a lot too if he declares. When politicians are out of sight they are remembered more fondly than when they start getting in the fray again. He also dropped from 82-8 to 74-15 with just Democrats in that time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 You are here: Home / 2020 Campaign / Kamala Harris Dominates on Voter Curiousity Kamala Harris Dominates on Voter Curiousity March 19, 2019 at 4:50 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 6 Comments “Google provided The Washington Post with U.S. search data since Jan. 1. It pools similar searches — Bernie, Bernie Sanders, Sanders, etc. — into buckets, which it then tracks. Search totals are relative to one another, with 100 being the peak interest in any of the candidates. That peak came with Harris’s initial announcement.” “She also got another spike a few days later, corresponding with her kickoff event in Oakland. That secondary event itself generated more search interest than any other candidate except Sanders or O’Rourke.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 4 hours ago, oldschool said: ? This literally doesn't make any sense. There are plenty of democratic lawmakers who have a background in prosecution. Yes, and those lawmakers are conservative and appeal to conservative voters. This is using the old-fashioned definition of conservative, rather that the banana state paramilitary fascist / terrorists that wanna own the term these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 Harris is easily the least intriguing candidate running for me. She has a chance to change my mind with the debates but from what I've seen so far, meh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, patsplat said: Yes, and those lawmakers are conservative and appeal to conservative voters. This is using the old-fashioned definition of conservative, rather that the banana state paramilitary fascist / terrorists that wanna own the term these days. Data? There are a ton of liberal prosecutors at every level of government. Seems like someone has a bias against prosecutors... Edited March 20, 2019 by oldschool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 53 minutes ago, oldschool said: Data? There are a ton of liberal prosecutors at every level of government. Seems like someone has a bias toward prosecutors... Anecdotal from civil rights / immigration defense lawyers, and from family working in investigative departments, and observation over the years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 And did you mean bias against? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 I'm going to have some Kamala olives on my salad tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 1 hour ago, patsplat said: Anecdotal from civil rights / immigration defense lawyers, and from family working in investigative departments, and observation over the years. No real data. Got it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 1 hour ago, patsplat said: And did you mean bias against? Yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 8 hours ago, Starkiller said: The country is full of sheep. But Trump still only won because of low turnout. That isn’t going to happen again in 2020. Check out the voter turnout in 2018, which was the highest midterm turnout rate in a century. Plus, plenty of independents who went with Trump in 2016 have already turned on him. 3 years of Trump are starting to wear on people. I fear pessimism is starting to set in. If any other president in history not named Trump had Trump's numbers right now, people would be calling him a dead man walking but here we are, somehow afraid that we're not going to have good turnout or win independents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 40 minutes ago, Mythos27 said: 3 years of Trump are starting to wear on people. I fear pessimism is starting to set in. If any other president in history not named Trump had Trump's numbers right now, people would be calling him a dead man walking but here we are, somehow afraid that we're not going to have good turnout or win independents. Which will continue to motivate the opposition come election time... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 6 hours ago, Mythos27 said: 3 years of Trump are starting to wear on people. I fear pessimism is starting to set in. If any other president in history not named Trump had Trump's numbers right now, people would be calling him a dead man walking but here we are, somehow afraid that we're not going to have good turnout or win independents. Reagan was around 42% at this point in his first term too.... the electoral college levels the field. It's all about OH, FL, PA, and the former blue wall. If the blue collar voters in those states think the economy is serving them they wont flip. Stop acting like Trump is doomed to lose. He has a very good shot at being reelected if we don't hit a recession next year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.