Jump to content

OFFICIAL Warren for President thread


Legaltitan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Justafan said:

Exaggerate your Native American heritage = ineligible to run for President!

 

Caught on camera bragging about grabbing women by the pussy = LOCKER ROOM TALK!

 

He also made some rambling lie about his parents being from Germany 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

They are afraid she will push real reforms to take away their ability to drive policy.   About fucking time!

bernie zealot in the house!

One thing that makes me dislike Bernie is his supporters. Maybe that's unfair but so many of them are super annoying   They are often annoying idiots, e.g.       And

Posted Images

10 minutes ago, Justafan said:

It's not even about the double standard.  Trump supporters have ZERO credibility to criticize any candidate for unethical behavior, exaggerating their exploits, making insensitive remarks, lying, downplaying, or whataboutism.  

 

This very scandal about Hunter Biden...... Ivanka and Jerod are literally getting money from Trump's office. Jerod got his NY building paid off by Qatar after threatening them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

This very scandal about Hunter Biden...... Ivanka and Jerod are literally getting money from Trump's office. Jerod got his NY building paid off by Qatar after threatening them. 

Oh, Javanka are the worst.  There is no scandal about Biden either.  It's a complete non story inflated to draw attention away from what is actually happening.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/01/elizabeth-warren-mark-zuckerberg-2020-014696
 

Elizabeth Warren fired back at Mark Zuckerberg on Twitter Tuesday morning, after the Facebook founder and CEO said it would "suck" if his company had to fight her future administration's plans to break up certain tech giants. 
 

“What would really ‘suck’ is if we don’t fix a corrupt system that lets giant companies like Facebook engage in illegal anticompetitive practices, stomp on consumer privacy rights, and repeatedly fumble their responsibility to protect our democracy,” the Massachusetts senator tweeted.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.vox.com/2019/10/2/20893854/elizabeth-warrens-anti-corruption-lobbying-tax
 

Elizabeth Warren wants to tax the corporate lobbying she says is breaking the American political system.
 

Warren, whose presidential campaign has been incrementally releasing a package of anti-corruption proposals, has unveiled a plan to tax corporations and trade organizations that spend a lot of money lobbying Congress and federal agencies.

 

The proposal would tax groups and companies that spend between $500,000 and $1 million per year on lobbying at a 35 percent rate, increasing the rate for bigger lobbying budgets. Corporations and trade groups that spend more than $1 million per year on lobbying would get hit with a 60 percent tax rate, and those spending more than $5 million would see a 75 percent tax rate.

 

These brackets would hit the pocketbooks of big pharmaceutical and health insurance companies, the real estate industry, fossil fuel companies, Wall Street firms, and electric utilities the hardest. They do not apply to charitable or social welfare organizations that also lobby the government, such as 501(c)3 and 501(c)4 nonprofit groups, but do apply to trade and professional associations, 501(c)6 groups.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2019 at 11:45 AM, Starkiller said:

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/01/elizabeth-warren-mark-zuckerberg-2020-014696
 

Elizabeth Warren fired back at Mark Zuckerberg on Twitter Tuesday morning, after the Facebook founder and CEO said it would "suck" if his company had to fight her future administration's plans to break up certain tech giants. 
 

“What would really ‘suck’ is if we don’t fix a corrupt system that lets giant companies like Facebook engage in illegal anticompetitive practices, stomp on consumer privacy rights, and repeatedly fumble their responsibility to protect our democracy,” the Massachusetts senator tweeted.

 

She's right (correct) on a lot of issues.  She just needs to show that she isn't a complete ideologue.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Starkiller said:

https://www.vox.com/2019/10/2/20893854/elizabeth-warrens-anti-corruption-lobbying-tax
 

Elizabeth Warren wants to tax the corporate lobbying she says is breaking the American political system.

 

It's a start, but I'm assuming the corporations would respond by accelerating the trend of astroturfing to get their agendas implemented.  We'd become even more reliant on good investigative journalism to help us with transparency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, begooode said:

 

It's a start, but I'm assuming the corporations would respond by accelerating the trend of astroturfing to get their agendas implemented.  We'd become even more reliant on good investigative journalism to help us with transparency.


It’s certainly not a perfect fix. But if you can’t ban it then tax the hell out of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Starkiller said:

https://www.vox.com/2019/10/2/20893854/elizabeth-warrens-anti-corruption-lobbying-tax
 

Elizabeth Warren wants to tax the corporate lobbying she says is breaking the American political system.
 

Warren, whose presidential campaign has been incrementally releasing a package of anti-corruption proposals, has unveiled a plan to tax corporations and trade organizations that spend a lot of money lobbying Congress and federal agencies.

 

The proposal would tax groups and companies that spend between $500,000 and $1 million per year on lobbying at a 35 percent rate, increasing the rate for bigger lobbying budgets. Corporations and trade groups that spend more than $1 million per year on lobbying would get hit with a 60 percent tax rate, and those spending more than $5 million would see a 75 percent tax rate.

 

These brackets would hit the pocketbooks of big pharmaceutical and health insurance companies, the real estate industry, fossil fuel companies, Wall Street firms, and electric utilities the hardest. They do not apply to charitable or social welfare organizations that also lobby the government, such as 501(c)3 and 501(c)4 nonprofit groups, but do apply to trade and professional associations, 501(c)6 groups.

 

This is a terrible idea. The better idea is to do your best to force congress to deal with Citizens United in a meaningful way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

This is a terrible idea. The better idea is to do your best to force congress to deal with Citizens United in a meaningful way. 


That would be great, but if the conservative Supreme Court would continue to protect the whole money = free speech idea then Citizens United And the like aren’t going away anytime soon. Gotta attack the problem any way they can.

 

Also, Citizens United doesn't cover lobbying.

Edited by Starkiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...