Jump to content
TennesseeTuxedo

Random Lobbyist (not a founder of Greenpeace) - Climate Crisis Is Fake Science and Fake News

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TennesseeTuxedo said:

You must not pay attention to the real news.

 

if you want an echo chamber have at it. I’m the one educating your babies.

Tell us your theory of how the volcanoes are going to suck up the CO2 again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rolltide   
4 minutes ago, Titans_Win_Again said:

Tell us your theory of how the volcanoes are going to suck up the CO2 again!

Why not tell us how the earth has cooled since 1998? Has not gotten steadily warmer. In the 70s scientists predicted a new ice age based on the idea that the warming rays of the sun could not penetrate the ozone. Then in the 80s they decided that the sun's rays can penetrate the ozone they just cannot escape so global warming. So these super smart scientists went from a new ice age to us being able to grow oranges in Alaska in a span of a decade!

 

When public support for global warming peaked and began to dissipate they came up with climate change that allows them to use any unusual or atypical weather as an opportunity for propaganda.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Rolltide said:

Why not tell us how the earth has cooled since 1998? Has not gotten steadily warmer. In the 70s scientists predicted a new ice age based on the idea that the warming rays of the sun could not penetrate the ozone. Then in the 80s they decided that the sun's rays can penetrate the ozone they just cannot escape so global warming. So these super smart scientists went from a new ice age to us being able to grow oranges in Alaska in a span of a decade!

 

When public support for global warming peaked and began to dissipate they came up with climate change that allows them to use any unusual or atypical weather as an opportunity for propaganda.  

WRONG!

 

The four hottest years on record have come in the decade of the 2010s

Of the 10 hottest years on record, only two came before 1998 (1934, 1921)

https://www.climatecentral.org/gallery/graphics/10-hottest-us-years-on-record

 

What kind of retarded conspiracy theory do you have to buy into to think that the world's scientists have something to gain by dissuading carbon emissions? Seriously

 

You're not more worried about Exxon and BP spreading misinformation as they have a direct financial motive to burn as much oil as possible?

 

And even besides the climate changing we can see smog and environmental destruction from oil leaks, coal mining and ash disposal. Why would you not be in favor of reducing that?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most media conservatives have pivoted to saying man made climate change is real but the solutions would be too costly and not solve the problem (since we’d need China and India to reduce emissions too). 

 

Fun to see the conservatives here are all off their rocker though.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WG53   
4 hours ago, TennesseeTuxedo said:

You must not pay attention to the real news.

 

if you want an echo chamber have at it. I’m the one educating your babies.

If by the exact opposite of educating then yes, but actual educating? Fuck no you haven't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Titans279 said:

Most media conservatives have pivoted to saying man made climate change is real but the solutions would be too costly and not solve the problem (since we’d need China and India to reduce emissions too). 

 

Fun to see the conservatives here are all off their rocker though.   

The climate is cyclical. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Soxcat   

Basically the cycle of cooling and warming has followed the same pattern for thousands of years and the temp started rising around the turn of the century coming out of the little ice age.  The correlation between higher CO2 and rising temp is not substantiated.  Temps have essentially been flat after peaking in 1998.  Basically we are at the top of a warming cycle that has repeated it self for thousands of years despite rises in CO2.  Also, from 1950 to 1980 temps were very flat despite man made CO2 starting to effect the CO2 levels after WWII.  Even with the warming that started around 1900 we have only seen a rise in global temps of 1 degree C.

 

Climate Gate proved that the science was weak and efforts were made to hide the real data.  Add in the ridiculous computer models that have proven the hypothesis wrong have been ignored.   

 

Edited by Soxcat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Rogue said:

Deforestation is certainly a part of it.  It's all cumulative. 

I meant to put part of the reason. There are certainly plenty of factors, but this certainly plays into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eventually fossil fuels are going to run out.   Far left dumbass libtards would have you believe that the end of world will come before that happens.  The United States without the gov't forcing the issue has already made movements towards the future with cleaner renewable energy sources.   This is far from what is taking place in large countries like China and India.  

 

We definitely should strive to develop workable clean renewable energy sources, but not at the expense that would cripple us like the new green deal.   Less pollution is a good thing, but so is having a healthy thriving economy.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Jamalisms said:

I'm also not interested in babysitting thread tags, so @TennesseeTuxedo, pick something accurate moving forward or I'll assume you're somehow autogenerating these threads as spam and I'll label your account as such.

He must be hitting a nerve with you. @Rolltide has done a nice job with his side of the argument. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, required moderation because people posting topics mislabeled them and haven't taken the time or effort to do something extremely simple is annoying. That is correct. And it won't be tolerated if it's a repeat issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jamalisms said:

Yes, required moderation because people posting topics mislabeled them and haven't taken the time or effort to do something extremely simple is annoying. That is correct. And it won't be tolerated if it's a repeat issue.

Ah, the Nazi Jamal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said:

Ah, the Nazi Jamal.

Rolltide asked a great question as to why Jamal hasn't done anything with the hundreds of threads created on Russian collusion.  

 

Assume it was Jamal that banned Thor.

Edited by Little Earl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rolltide   

This is what the politics section looked like a year ago. 

 

Collusion

Collusion

Collusion

Impeach

Impeach

Impeach

Manafort

Cohen

Manafort

Cohen in Prague

Cohen in Prague

Cohen in Prague

Trump dumb x130,000

 

How many Trump is dumb threads have there been? Why not fold them all into one? An entire major political party is imploding and you call Trump dumb? You have a 12 year old retard calling the shots in your party. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...