Jump to content
Tex in a Can

Should JRob have hired LaFleur as Head Coach?

Should JRob have hired LaFleur as Head Coach last off season?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Should JRob have hired LaFleur as Head Coach last off season?

    • Yes JROb should have hired LaFleur as the Head Coach last off season
    • No, JRob made the right decision to not hire LaFleur as the Head Coach last off season


Recommended Posts

Hindsight is 20-20, but we hope JRob has a pretty good crystal ball. If continuity for Mariota was a concern, LaFleur as HC would have done it.

 

Can't seem to be able to remove the pics below... weird.

small prep.jpg

suck.jpg

bigger.JPG

Edited by Tex in a Can
trying to remove pics of luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, headhunter said:

Why ask this

continuity for Mariota, more forward looking (like Green Bay?), just interested in what people think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tgo   

I voted no, in hindsight. 

 

Robinson said on the radio that they didn't expect him to leave after only 1 year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, headhunter said:

No idea who is staff would be, his oc or dc so its irrelevant. Likely woudve had a worse record. 

I wonder if he would have called plays himself ala McVay, guess we will find out what he does in Green Bay soon.

Edited by Tex in a Can

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tgo   

I misunderstood the question. I read "for OC" instead of "HC" for some reason. 

 

And Robinson shouldn't have hired him for either. 

 

Vrabel has a chance to be a top coach in this league. 

Edited by tgo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
scine09   

I have my reservations about LaFleur as a HC.  Maybe he'll succeed because of Rodgers but will the locker room listen to him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tgo   
2 minutes ago, oldschool said:

I like vrabel but it's hard to argue against an offensive HC with the way the game is played now.

Our success this year had little to do with having an offensive HC though. 

 

Same with the last two years. 

 

It had so much more to do with multiple "intangible" factors attributable to Vrabel's leadership and the guys we have on the team. 

 

We've been winning in spite of our offensive woes, because of the intangible things Vrabel and Mularkey have brought to the table. 

Edited by tgo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, tgo said:

Our success this year had little to do with having an offensive HC though. 

 

Same with the last two years. 

 

It had so much more to do with multiple "intangible" factors attributable to Vrabel's leadership and the guys we have on the team. 

 

We've been winning in spite of our offensive woes, because of the intangible things Vrabel and Mularkey have brought to the table. 

I suspect vrabel interceded with the offense a few times. That's the problem with a def HC. They are usually too conservative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...