TennesseeTuxedo

THE BIG UGLY - DO NOT MERGE (Merged: Mod)

Recommended Posts

A New Clinton Email Emerges In Which Clinton Camp Brags About Killing An Unflattering Story On Uranium One.

http

://investmentwatchblog.com/a-new-clinton-email-emerges-in-which-clinton-camp-brags-about-killing-an-unflattering-story-on-uranium-one/

Of course, this is not surprising to learn that the Clintons were proud of killing an unflattering story on them.  This is just one of many, but it is very relevant in today’s news.  

Before, we begin on unflattering emails, I want to present the following Wikileaks emails and the story on the Uranium One deal with Russia:

Hillary sold 20% of America’s uranium to Russia as SoS, Clinton camp worried that the deal is being investigated.?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/286

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/225

“It’s out there.”?

This isn’t a smoking gun leak (since the Grassley letter was posted publicly) but it shows the Clinton campaign’s nervousness about this incredibly damning story being investigated.

 

‘Uranium One’ explanation: As Secretary of State, Hillary approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to the Russian state-owned firm ‘Uranium One’, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.  She literally sold off a rare and prime material used in nukes to a country we are at odds with for cold hard cash.  John Podesta also has ties to Russia exposed through the WikiLeaks, owning 75,000 shares in a Putin-backed energy company.

 

In the following email number:  https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/303

You can read for yourself how the Clinton campaign “killed a Bloomberg story” attempting to link Clinton’s opposition to the anti-Russia legislation known as the Magnitsky Act to a speech that Bill Clinton delivered in Moscow for $500,000. 

“With the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link HRC’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow.”

Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

 

We discover that Hillary Clinton fought against the Magnitsky Act, which I believe gave Russia exactly what it deserved.  Wealthy Russians who had participated in the imprisonment and death of Magnitsky, who was a lawyer trying to do his job, were banned from the United States.  This infuriated Russia, so during the Uranium Deal, Hillary worked against the Act.

“The administration, starting with Hillary Clinton and then John Kerry, did everything they could do to stop the Magnitsky act,” said American hedge fund manager Bill Browder, who was instrumental in lobbying Congress in favor of the bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Investigate Hillary's Uranium One Collusion with Russia

 

Yet seemingly the only thing warranting a major federal investigation is a wasted 20 minutes of Donald Trump Jr.s life that he will never get back. Democrats and the media and, again, apologies for the redundancy, had no problem with Bill and Hillary Clinton brokering deals giving Russia and Putin 20 percent of our uranium supply to benefit  Clinton Foundation donors, including Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra.

Giustra earlier had a cozy relationship with Bill Clinton and participated in and benefitted from his involvement in a scam run by the Clinton Foundation in Colombia.

Clinton donor Giustra benefited significantly from his association, even if the people of Columbia didn’t:

When we met him (Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo)  in his wood-paneled office in Colombia’s Capitol building in May, his desk was stacked high with papers related to Pacific Rubiales’s labor practices, the result of years of investigative work by his staff. He did not see the Clinton Foundation and its partnership with Giustra’s Pacific Rubiales as either progressive or positive. “The territory where Pacific Rubiales operated,” he said, thumbing through pages of alleged human-rights violations, “was a type of concentration camp for workers.”…

In September 2005, Giustra and Clinton flew to Kazakhstan together to meet the Central Asian nation’s president. Shortly thereafter, Giustra secured a lucrative concession to mine Kazakh uranium, despite his company’s lack of experience with the radioactive ore. As Bill Clinton opened doors for Giustra, the financier gave generously to Clinton’s foundation.

As the New York Times reported, this mutual back-scratching gave Clinton donor Giustra control of a significant portion of the world’s uranium supply:

Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton….

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges….

In February 2007, a company called Uranium One agreed to pay $3.1 billion to acquire UrAsia. Mr. Giustra, a director and major shareholder in UrAsia, would be paid $7.05 per share for a company that just two years earlier was trading at 10 cents per share.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/07/investigate_hillarys_uranium_one_collusion_with_russia.html#ixzz4n0hcRpEH 
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Opus74 said:

Wrong forum you doofus.  Put it in POLTICS where it belongs.  Don't be spreading your shit all over the board.

Thread was made before the politics section.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is the out rage among Democrats in regards to Hillary colluding with the Ukraine to influence the 2016 presidential election?

We have the facts and evidence that  Hillary work hand-in-hand with the Ukraine president to influence the election. Yet there's no evidence what ever even begin suggesting that President Trump anything with the Russians and yet the media range with this.

 That is exactly why the majority of Americans consider the mainstream media as fake news .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) she didn't win 

2) it was an aid with no known connection to Hillary 

3) Hillary doesn't have a shit ton of proRussian or proPutin policies 

4) it's Ukraine, not Russia 

Edited by reo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...if this is true, it def needs to be investigated. 

Brings up another question..why has your president not done anything to investigate? We have a repub house, a repub senate, and a repub President who ran on a platform of "Lock her up". Where is the outrage in this? There is either no evidence, Trump lied on the campaign trail, or he is incompetent to actually follow through. This should be easy for him..tell his justice dept to investigate and lock her up!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, what you're saying is not true from the latest I had read. 

Hillary didn't collude with the Ukrainian president. 

Supposedly it was a low level aide action on her own to gather information. I don't think there's any high level involvement or illegal activity done by their party... right? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.