Former FBI Agent: Possible Russia, Trump Campaign Collusion Worries Me

[TitanDuckFan]

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

Duck, you're applying different standards and levels of scrutiny on people based on how much you hate them. If you believe Hillary fucked you then fine. But where is this ire for a Trump administration that is currently balls deep in all of us and lying with no shame? Why are you so willing to look the other way? You're smart enough to see by now that those clowns are just out to loot the country. Why not call bullshit on them too?

When they "loot the country" I'll scream for their heads.

But the day we start conducting the legal system in this country like some kind of twisted Minority Report plot, we're doomed.

We're barely 2 months in.  Give it a rest.

Hillary's tenure as SoS lasted 4 years, and we've had 4 years to review the events surrounding it.

You guys sat back without a peep for 7 of those 8 years, and when you finally did speak up you defended her, and still are.

And then you have the audacity to tell me I'm applying different standards?  That's fucking laughable.

SMMFH.

[MamlngEnvy]

1 hour ago, TitanDuckFan said:

When they "loot the country" I'll scream for their heads.

But the day we start conducting the legal system in this country like some kind of twisted Minority Report plot, we're doomed.

We're barely 2 months in.  Give it a rest.

Hillary's tenure as SoS lasted 4 years, and we've had 4 years to review the events surrounding it.

You guys sat back without a peep for 7 of those 8 years, and when you finally did speak up you defended her, and still are.

And then you have the audacity to tell me I'm applying different standards?  That's fucking laughable.

SMMFH.

Fan grandpa 

[reo]

21 hours ago, TitanDuckFan said:

No, he did NOT say that.

So... no response to this:

18 hours ago, reo said:

That was a week earlier. After he got access to more of the intel he said this

 

13 hours ago, TitanDuckFan said:

Bull. Shit.

As Secretary of State her official communications do not belong to her.  They belong to the country/people.  She chose a system that allowed her to mix-match and obfuscate that, so she should have surrendered EVERYTHING, and let an official entity sort it out.  Then some/most of those that did do the sorting, went before the congressional committees and took the 5th when asked about it.

The rules on this were changed on this before she took office, and she signed the papers acknowledging her intent of compliance, and she didn't follow through.

So, she either fucked you on purpose or out of incompetence.

But we all got screwed by hillary regardless.

Are you as upset about Trump's use of a private server? Should we have an investigation?

[TitanDuckFan]

22 minutes ago, reo said:

So... no response to this:

Actually, it was only 3 days later, not a week.

But what Schiff "thinks" is no more relevant than what Nunes "thinks."

And Nunes was first told about this back in January, so I "think" he's more well acquainted with what happened, but neither have proven anything yet.
 

Quote

Are you as upset about Trump's use of a private server? Should we have an investigation?

 

Since he didn't use it to conduct government business after he knew better, no.  The day he does, and then admits it before a congressional committee, we can have that conversation too.

[reo]

2 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said:

Actually, it was only 3 days.

So... my not looking up the exact timeline means you were less wrong about comments you knew nothing about?

2 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said:

But what Schiff "thinks" is no more relevant than what Nunes "thinks."

Nunes? The same guy that received intel from the White House and then made a show of giving that intel to the White House? Not overly credible.

2 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said:

And Nunes was first told about this back in January, so I "think" he's more well acquainted with what happened, but neither have proven anything yet.

He wasn't given all of this information back in January.

[TitanDuckFan]

1 minute ago, reo said:

So... my not looking up the exact timeline means you were less wrong about comments you knew nothing about?

Nunes? The same guy that received intel from the White House and then made a show of giving that intel to the White House? Not overly credible.

He wasn't given all of this information back in January.

No, your exact timeline is meaningless, and not the point.  But Schiff still says he thinks there's more to it, just like Nunes thinks trump was spied on.  But Schiff didn't even have time, in the course of 3 days, to get all of the info Nunes has.  Regardless, both have offered little proof, but a lot of speculation.  So one's opinion is much like the other's.

Nunes went to the SCIF in the EEOB on the White House grounds.    Do you even understand how this works?  An IC analyst has to show them what they want to see.  But they still have to know what to ask for.  If you noticed, Schiff had to go to the EEOB to get that same info.  It's sequestered there.

Have you followed any of the info that's NOT coming from the left's echo-chamber? 

[reo]

22 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said:

No, your exact timeline is meaningless, and not the point. 

You're the one that clarified it to make it seem like you knew about what I brought up all along... which you obviously didn't.

22 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said:

But Schiff still says he thinks there's more to it, just like Nunes thinks trump was spied on.  But Schiff didn't even have time, in the course of 3 days, to get all of the info Nunes has.  Regardless, both have offered little proof, but a lot of speculation.  So one's opinion is much like the other's.

What's your basis for saying Schiff doesn't know what Nunes knows much less that it would take more than 3 days to know it?

Quote

Nunes went to the SCIF in the EEOB on the White House grounds.    Do you even understand how this works?  An IC analyst has to show them what they want to see.  But they still have to know what to ask for.  If you noticed, Schiff had to go to the EEOB to get that same info.  It's sequestered there.

I actually work in a SCIF so yeah, I know how it works. Ever been in one?

The information came from guys who work for the National Security Council. Those guys have a direct line to the president. They don't need to go through Nunes to talk to Trump. Trump already had access to the information and yet Nunes made a show of telling him before he told the rest of his committee.

Quote

Have you followed any of the info that's NOT coming from the left's echo-chamber? 

Such as?