Jump to content

Senator Denies Climate Change On Senate Floor And Gets A Science Lesson From His Colleague


reo

Recommended Posts

Romney got his ass kicked.

 

Don't let the secret out Jamal. It would crush republican hearts across the Nation if they were to admit to themselves that they have lost the last two elections in electoral landslides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 423
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

FoxNews

HAHAHA. Hopefully you don't have any offspring. 

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/ "Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on

Posted Images

As is the case for most flat earth believers in this crap you can't read with comprehension. As in if there actually is a rise in this century, 100 years, it isn't much. Did that clear it up for yea?

 

As per usual there's lots of research out there saying that's incorrect.

 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/no-pause-in-global-sea-level-rise/

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.c3headlines.com/are-oceans-rising/

We can go back and forth all day with articles and that is exactly my point. We have what is real and we have what is BS. Real numbers say we have a rise in sea level of 4 inches in the last decade. Al Gore (and he appreciates your support and money) says we are going to have 20+ feet.

So decide what group you want to be in. The smart group or the flat earth group? I really believe 100 years from now history will look back on the stupidity of mankind and revere the few who stood up for the truth. Those promoting Chicken Little will be the brunt of jokes for a millennia. Stupid people will forever be called Gorites or something. Actually I can't think of any better way to put someone in their place calling them both stupid and deceptive than calling them a Gorite.

http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c0192aca7d7b0970d-500wi

 

So you agree that sea levels are rising now? Just the degree that you're worried about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the best interviews that really identifies this issue was with the controversial Professor Philip Jones who was at the center of the Climategate scandal. Read through this guys interview, read carefully his responses and then tell me anyone can come to the conclusion this is a closed issue and we need people lecturing us on this issue.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm

 

I'm not really sure what the point was in post that. This part was interesting

 

E - How confident are you that warming has taken place and that humans are mainly responsible?

I'm 100% confident that the climate has warmed. As to the second question, I would go along with IPCC Chapter 9 - there's evidence that most of the warming since the 1950s is due to human activity.

 

 

Again, has there been warming and some sea level changes? Quite possible.

 

At least you're finally starting to admit this. It's the first step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even more meaningless. Knowing that Obama can not run again it is easy to make blanket statements. Face it.......Obama won when it mattered.

 

Almost the exact same thing was said right before the last election actually.... and during.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, the point was to begin with that the majority are dumber than a rock which is why he won. Polls out now seem to indicate he wouldn't win now (9 points). That is where the position came from.

He said the exact same about the polls before the last election. Also, are you saying that you are superior in intelligence than the majority? Hell, you can't even think for yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, the point was to begin with that the majority are dumber than a rock which is why he won.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/

"Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men

The study found that young adults who said they were "very conservative" had an average adolescent IQ of 95, whereas those who said they were "very liberal" averaged 106."

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one has to give up their cars, dufus50

One thing is clear, however: the Anthropocene has proved unfriendly to ice so far, and that will get worse as a new Arctic emerges. "This situation is unprecedented," Schaefer says. "The faster you burn fossil fuels, the faster the Arctic is going to warm."

Take your head out of the sand. Did you not read the article. You did post the article right. This is the last paragraph. Basically by you driving your car this is occurring. That is the problem with the Global warming crowd. They yip about this huge problem on how temps are going to rise and sea levels are going to flood all these people and then when it comes to the solution (stop burning fossil fuels) they burn as many as any uneducated Global warming non believer.

Take the lead and be a man. Sell your car.

Edited by efus50
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually if you go by what these alarmists are saying we are already screwed. That is what is so stupid about all of this. We could all give up our cars and not be able to stop this incredible destruction of our planet. We have passed the "tipping point".Now, back to reality:http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/23/surprise-peer-reviewed-study-says-current-arctic-sea-ice-is-more-extensive-than-most-of-the-past-9000-years/

Oh, I definitely think we are already too late to stop it. Hell, we are already seeing the effects in the arctic for sure as well as more droughts and flooding elsewhere.

But we still need to fight it in order to lessen the effects. The more CO2 we pump into the air now, the faster things change and the worse the effects are

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing is clear, however: the Anthropocene has proved unfriendly to ice so far, and that will get worse as a new Arctic emerges. "This situation is unprecedented," Schaefer says. "The faster you burn fossil fuels, the faster the Arctic is going to warm."Take your head out of the sand. Did you not read the article. You did post the article right. This is the last paragraph. Basically by you driving your car this is occurring. That is the problem with the Global warming crowd. They yip about this huge problem on how temps are going to rise and sea levels are going to flood all these people and then when it comes to the solution (stop burning fossil fuels) they burn as many as any uneducated Global warming non believer.Take the lead and be a man. Sell your car.

This is the stuff morons say.

We don't need to stop using energy today. We need to start using renewable fuels, which requires a transition period, and being more energy efficient, which we can do right now. It's easy to cut your auto emissions in half overnight, as I did, with no real sacrifice. Buying solar panels can significantly limit the fossil fuels needed to run your house or businesses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...