Jump to content
OILERMAN

The passing game/Mariota

Recommended Posts

abc2330   
1 hour ago, MemphisTitan said:

 

 

1 hour ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Trust me, I watch GB. I'm not going off just stats.

 

If Davis was better than Adams, he should be making Mariota better, not the other way around. He has done that for maybe 3 games in his short career so far. 

Did you watch Adams in his second year?  He was atrocious.  I think PFF ranked him next to last in the league at his position.  Adams is certainly more polished in his 5th year, but Davis being able to play at that level in his second year with crummy QB play says a lot about him and what he could do.

 

You can't seriously compare the production and presence of a Rodgers receiver to that of a guy who has led some of the worst passing offenses every year.  Rodgers was tearing it up before Adams, and Mariota was throwing for under 3.5k yards before Davis.  There is a correlation

Did you watch Adams in his second year?  He was atrocious.  I think PFF ranked him next to last in the league at his position.  Adams is certainly more polished in his 5th year, but Davis being able to play at that level in his second year with crummy QB play says a lot about him and what he could do.

 

You can't seriously compare the production and presence of a Rodgers receiver to that of a guy who has led some of the worst passing offenses every year.  Rodgers was tearing it up before Adams, and Mariota was throwing for under 3.5k yards before Davis.  There is a correlation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MemphisTitan said:

Davis would easily put up over 1500 yards with Rodgers throwing to him

Idk about an easy 1500 yds but with Rodgers any WR that is on the field with him as a chance to be a stud. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, abc2330 said:

 

Did you watch Adams in his second year?  He was atrocious.  I think PFF ranked him next to last in the league at his position.  Adams is certainly more polished in his 5th year, but Davis being able to play at that level in his second year with crummy QB play says a lot about him and what he could do.

 

You can't seriously compare the production and presence of a Rodgers receiver to that of a guy who has led some of the worst passing offenses every year.  Rodgers was tearing it up before Adams, and Mariota was throwing for under 3.5k yards before Davis.  There is a correlation

Did you watch Adams in his second year?  He was atrocious.  I think PFF ranked him next to last in the league at his position.  Adams is certainly more polished in his 5th year, but Davis being able to play at that level in his second year with crummy QB play says a lot about him and what he could do.

 

You can't seriously compare the production and presence of a Rodgers receiver to that of a guy who has led some of the worst passing offenses every year.  Rodgers was tearing it up before Adams, and Mariota was throwing for under 3.5k yards before Davis.  There is a correlation

Second year?

 

And...

 

Mariota was atrocious in years 3 and 4 so far.

 

So point is?

 

Outside of one game, Davis has been atrocious. 

 

So point is?

 

You know what the difference is. 

 

Adams has been the clear #2 behind Jordy his entire career up until now. And he is on pace to smash all of his career highs.

 

Davis has supposedly been great since day 1. But outside of a couple games, that has not been the case..

 

Same ppl also said Mariota was better than Watson and Wentz and Goff and who...

 

How's that looking these days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wiscotitansfan said:

And I don't watch GB? LOL

Did I say that? Uhhmm nope. Same ppl who claimed to have watched Lonzo said he's a bust just because he shot poorly. So I guess ppl who watch someone cant have a biased opinion. Imagine that. Obviously no one in here has a biased opinion towards Davis....

3 hours ago, wiscotitansfan said:

 

Adams is better than people give him credit for but it's Rodgers that makes him, maybe has to do with that he knows where to be pretty much all the time but he's much less talented than CD and it's not close. I can't believe you're actually trying to imply that the Packers are better off with Adams than if they had CD instead of him.

Not arguing hypotheticals. 

 

Brady was better with Moss. But did they win?

 

Mariota was better under Mularkey. But yall say LaFleur is leaps and bounds better, huh?

 

Next?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Did I say that? Uhhmm nope. Same ppl who claimed to have watched Lonzo said he's a bust just because he shot poorly. So I guess ppl who watch someone cant have a biased opinion. Imagine that. Obviously no one in here has a biased opinion towards Davis....

Not arguing hypotheticals. 

 

Brady was better with Moss. But did they win?

 

Mariota was better under Mularkey. But yall say LaFleur is leaps and bounds better, huh?

 

Next?

What does ANY of that gibberish have to do with CD being more talented than Adams?

 

Your Moss reference is ridiculous and retarded at best too, the Pats were MUCH MUCH better with Moss than without him. Just because they didn't win the Superbowl that year doesn't make that statement false.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wiscotitansfan said:

What does ANY of that gibberish have to do with CD being more talented than Adams?

 

Your Moss reference is ridiculous and retarded at best too, the Pats were MUCH MUCH better with Moss than without him. Just because they didn't win the Superbowl that year doesn't make that statement false.

What does your hypothetical have to do with anything?

 

It's never going to be proven. So how can you use that as an argument?

 

Talk about gibberish.

 

What if I said TEN would be better with Goff?

 

Bet you argue it. Bet you say ahhh bla bla bla, hypothetical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

It's never going to be proven. So how can you use that as an argument?

Got it. So stats is literally the only argument to prove a guy's talent LOL\

 

4 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Bet you argue it. Bet you say ahhh bla bla bla, hypothetical.

Actually I would say that if he could stay on the field here and produce even remotely close to what he is doing now in LA, of course TEN would be better off.

Edited by wiscotitansfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wiscotitansfan said:

 

Got it. So stats is literally the only argument to prove a guy's talent LOL

Not at all.

 

But the fact Davis wears a Titans jersey is the biggest reason as to why yall think he is better.

 

I've seen plenty of good looking WRs with potential not amount to shit.

 

So is that what you're going off? The blue jersey and the eye test?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Not at all.

 

But the fact Davis wears a Titans jersey is the biggest reason as to why yall think he is better.

 

I've seen plenty of good looking WRs with potential not amount to shit.

 

So is that what you're going off? The blue jersey and the eye test?

No, the fact that I think he is a great athlete, who seems to have a good head on his shoulders and is physically capable of things that Adams is not makes me believe that he would do better than Adams if they were both put in the same vacuum.

 

I think Stefon Diggs is better than Adams and I'm much more biased for the Packers than the Vikings (and has never put up as good of numbers as Adams). I think Alshon Jeffery is better than Adams. A guy doesn't have to be a top 5 pick and wear a Titans jersey for me to think that he is more talented than Adams, who would still be at worst #2 on every team in the NFL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

No, the fact that I think he is a great athlete, who seems to have a good head on his shoulders and is physically capable of things that Adams is not makes me believe that he would do better than Adams if they were both put in the same vacuum.

 

I think Stefon Diggs is better than Adams and I'm much more biased for the Packers than the Vikings (and has never put up as good of numbers as Adams). I think Alshon Jeffery is better than Adams. A guy doesn't have to be a top 5 pick and wear a Titans jersey for me to think that he is more talented than Adams, who would still be at worst #2 on every team in the NFL.

So if Davis is as good as you think he is, should it matter who is throwing him the ball?

 

Green is better than Adams, right?

 

But Rodgers is better than Dalton.

 

Why does Green have better numbers and dominate his opponents more?

 

Why does Julio put up better numbers when Ryan isn't as good as Rodgers?

 

Why did Hopkins put up good numbers and dominate opponents with Hoyer?

 

Why did Mike Evans ball out with Wisnton? Who ppl said was worse than Mariota?

 

So are you saying Mariota is simply that bad and holding Davis back?

 

If not, why is Davis not performing to the level that you see him at?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JakePA_Titan said:

So are you saying Mariota is simply that bad and holding Davis back?

 

If not, why is Davis not performing to the level that you see him at?

Yes, this season so far that absolutely is the case... Mariota's one good game we aired it out (if you want to give him excuses or not that's fine), Davis balled out.

Edited by wiscotitansfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

Yes, this season so far that absolutely is the case... Mariota's one good game we aired it out (if you want to give him excuses or not that's fine), Davis balled out.

Outside of one game (IND) at least one WR has balled out (at least 110+ yards and 1 TD) against PHI.

 

That secondary is beat up and have guys (like Jalen Mills) that flat out suck.

 

Btw, Taylor also had his best game of the season (and probably career) against them. 

 

Hard to use that as an argument for Davis when everyone and their mom are torching the Eagles secondary.

Edited by JakePA_Titan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JakePA_Titan said:

Outside of one game (IND) at least one WR has balled out (at least 110+ yards and 1 TD) against PHI.

 

That secondary is beat up and have guys (like Jalen Millz) that flat out suck.

 

Btw, Taylor also had his best game of the season agaisnt them. 

 

Hard to use that as an argument for Davis when everyone and their mom are torching the Eagles secondary.

Hard to use Adams is a stud when he has Rodgers throwing to him. Cherry picking is pretty easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×