titanruss Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, JakePA_Titan said: I'm not offended. And I wouldn't say that. If JR says something, you think every man in that locker room always agrees with him? You think every player on the Cowboys agrees with Jones' take on the anthem? They might listen and respect his wishes because he signs their checks, but put them in a position where they face zero consequence and see what they have to say about it.... you're making a silly and pointless argument... a poor semantic argument at best. how do you define Fox news? how do you define their opinions? The highest ranking newsperson on staff openly states something on TV.... he doesnt get fired and they dont apologize. Dont over think things. Further.. YOU DONT WANT FOX TO AGREE WITH TRUMP HERE. Quit picking sides because thats the side you are on and use your brain. A president limiting free speech and the search for information because he is butthurt is a straight drop into 1984.. and thats not hyperbole dude. I can find anything on google, literally anything. Seek truth and know how and you can too. The simple fact is more people in the world make fun of Trump (deserved) than dont... so his searches show up more often as being a buffoon than with glowing praise. Edited August 29, 2018 by titanruss ChesterCopperpot1, rns90, MadMax, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, titanruss said: Further.. YOU DONT WANT FOX TO AGREE WITH TRUMP HERE. Quit picking sides because thats the side you are on and use your little brain. A president limiting free speech and the search for information because he is butthurt is a straight drop into 1984.. and thats not hyperbole dude. I can find anything on google, literally anything. Seek truth and know how and you can too. The simple fact is more people in the world make fun of Trump (deserved) than dont... so his searches show up more often as being a buffoon than with glowing praise. Most of his followers don't really want to expand their horizons. They just want their narrow "world view" reinforced. Starkiller, and titanruss 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, rns90 said: Most of his followers don't really want to expand their horizons. They just want their narrow "world view" reinforced. while claiming that none of the darkies want to work and all want handouts. its hypocrisy at its finest. i've seen more lazy industry workers than i have mexicans and ghetto folk combined. these coal miners and leftovers from dying industries expect the government to save them from poorly investing in their futures. true capitalism is literally happening all around them and its costing them their jobs... yet they dont try and play the game. they expect handouts (government investment) rather than learn new trades and skills - EVEN when offered freely to them. i shouldnt call them lazy. people are averse to change. especially lower educated people. but it happens to all. those poor folks and old folks call college grads with student loan debt "lazy / looking for handouts".. everyone calls old people "leechers who broke the healthcare system / looking for handouts / stealing our future" it goes both ways... its just the hypocrisy and self-righteousness cracks me up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somedude Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 ^ You're a fucking retard. How does one so stupid even exist in daily life? IsntLifeFunny, and WG53 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 53 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: I'm simply saying one person doesn't speak for a group unless that group signs off on it. Idc who agrees with him. I already stated that I think it's foolish as well. I dont get what you're trying to prove here. I already said unless you can stop those from putting news out there, this is pointless. Yes, he feels the need to defend news networks because he knows if Trump can actually regulate Google searches, regulating actual news outlets wont be far behind. But do you think they disagree with him on the fact fake news should be stopped? I doubt it. At least I hope not. And you're arguing about free speech and search for information, but what good is false information? When you search something, don't you want what you find to be factual? I don't see what's wrong with wanting to stop it, regardless of who it helps/hurts. I dont think its possible, but I don't think its a bad thing. I want dangerous substances abolished. Cigarettes for example. But are you going to sit here and cry its our freedom and right to smoke until we get cancer? Fine, do you, but some stuff is bad. Like fake news and cigerettes. Wanting to put an end to it should be universal. But hey, some like fake news like some like sucking on cancer sticks. i absolutely agree that fake news should be stopped. its already well on its way to being identified and cut out. thats what Trump is ACTUALLY pissed about. HE isnt in control of the news shown. Not the actual "Fake" news. He doesnt understand how computers and people can see through bullshit and he assumes its a political agenda when its just a computer recognizing bullshit and refusing to promote it. its not that he wants truth ... its that he wants HIS version of the truth and is trying to create a government editor that will decide what is and isnt truth... based on who is in office. there are already algorithms developed that can identify fake news with 95% certainty based solely on the way something is written without needing to cross reference. trump has zero place in that conversation. look at his affiliates as world leaders and in business and in office / jail look at how often he lies. look at which country introduced the world to misinformation and "fake news" - Russia. Look who he's buddy buddy with.. this is not someone you want determining what is and isnt truth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 31 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: No one has a more narrowed view than the left with calling everyone they disagree with racists. I mean, can they find any other arguments? Because they've been running with that for over two years now and it's getting them nowhere. they've actually been running that for around 40 years... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzTitan Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 Anyone who knows the basics of the web knows Google ranks based on quality (when it isn't being gamed aka black hat SEO). The reason Google ranks mainstream news sites better is because they have a higher page rank. They have a higher page rank because they have more traffic, and because they have websites made by professional teams who know how to make proper sites. They have teams to make sure their site it reliable and fast. The conspiracy news sites on the other hand are usually trash WordPress themes with lowest common denominator ads about fat loss and viagra. They have click bait headings and cross link to other trash. Google penalizes the shit out of them because they fail on many user experience fronts, nothing to do with agendas or the accuracy of content. I keep harping on it because it matters - most of these edge news sites don't even offer HTTPS let alone enforce it. It's the first thing I check whenever I come across one I've never heard of before. It's laughable a news source on the net can take itself seriously and not offer integrity of the information it presents to your browser. This lack of encryption is *specifically* penalized by Google now days. begooode, pat, Btowner, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 1 hour ago, TennesseeTuxedo said: When you have social media and companies such as google using extreme political bias, you beg for the FCC to get involved. Online fairness doctrine? Yeah, I remember how that’s soooo popular among conservatives for radio... titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanjuicy Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 5 hours ago, JakePA_Titan said: Ahh, that must impress you. I am really retarded! Somedude 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted August 29, 2018 Report Share Posted August 29, 2018 Jeez, I wonder if any searches for Hillary brings up any overly negative fake news. You just can't make this stuff up with you Trumpers. Well, actually Trump does it all the time, truth/contradictions be damned, because he knows exactly what you guys will do Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted September 12, 2018 Report Share Posted September 12, 2018 Find evidence... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted September 12, 2018 Report Share Posted September 12, 2018 23 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Find evidence... That's what you said all those years you claimed there was no liberal media bias. All the evidence in the world wasn't going to change your mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted September 12, 2018 Report Share Posted September 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Little Earl said: That's what you said all those years you claimed there was no liberal media bias. All the evidence in the world wasn't going to change your mind. You need some evidence first... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzTitan Posted September 12, 2018 Report Share Posted September 12, 2018 Quote Brad Parscale, Opinion contributor .... Brad Parscale is the campaign manager for Donald J. Trump for President. LOL That opinion piece is typically nonsense. It states that "Google’s fact-checking service “fact-checked” only conservative news websites", yet the very link it uses for this claim says "almost exclusively" - that's not the same thing. That, and the suggestion is complete nonsense - Google doesn't do fact checks, it uses various fact checking services and shows the outcomes based on ratios involving the amount of times the services had to fact check an outlet against the amount of overall content it produces. Basically, it's because the outlet as a whole has gone below some quality threshold because it posts too much bullshit. Again, Google as a content proxy rewards quality. IsntLifeFunny, and titanruss 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Posted September 12, 2018 Report Share Posted September 12, 2018 Simple Jake strikes again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.