Jump to content

Why didn’t the DNC turn over their server!?!?


Starkiller

Recommended Posts

(plagiarized)

All this stuff we have been bringing up must be frigging conspiracy talk... After all, it would require a technically proficient contractor with access to the FBI/NSA servers as well as the same contractor having access to the DNC/DCCC/Clinton servers... No company like that could exist...

Edited by thor
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I figured this deserved it’s own thread, just so any time the Trumptards bring it up we can point back to it...   https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/zmkxp9/dnc-server-conspiracy-theo

The in-memory point is a good one - remember the episode of Seinfeld when George wanted to move the Frogger machine without turning it off? You want to keep systems up and running because what they ha

1 hour ago, Soxcat said:

It certainly does appear the Russians were caught red handed which makes it baffling why Trump waffled on calling them out when he had all this evidence.  He should have taken the time to get some what knowledgeable about some of the fine points of the investigation to throw back into Putin's face. 

It’s not baffling at all. It’s the whole Trump modus operandi from the start. It’s FUD and he is Putin's puppet...

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Starkiller said:

It’s not baffling at all. It’s the whole Trump modus operandi from the start. It’s FUD and he is Putin's puppet...

Exactly

 

He couldn't call him out. He did what anyone compromised would do, Grin and bare it 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldschool said:

The saving grace on all this is that U.S. intelligence showed Putin we are able to trace their work back to Russia and in particular to the GRU. Not only that, but traced to individual members of 2 crack units. Its a message. Won't surprise me if some of the 12 go missing in the next few days.

You sure are good at telling everyone how technologically brilliant you are --- ok you and your team --- @Legaltitan explain to me where the evidence is that these indictments actually prove it leads to Russians... 

 

Come on now I want actual proof --- not some bullshit comments saying "Crowdstrike" gave us forensic evidence...

Edited by thor
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, thor said:

You sure are good at telling everyone how technologically brilliant you are --- ok you and your team --- @Legaltitan explain to me where the evidence is that these indictments actually prove it leads to Russians... 

 

Come on now I want actual proof --- not some bullshit comments saying "Crowdstrike" gave us forensic evidence...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldschool said:

The saving grace on all this is that U.S. intelligence showed Putin we are able to trace their work back to Russia and in particular to the GRU. Not only that, but traced to individual members of 2 crack units. Its a message. Won't surprise me if some of the 12 go missing in the next few days.

A corollary benefit on this — America, beacon of justice and all that.  Heard a npr interview with a Russian journalist who cited the detailed Mueller indictments as an objective piece of evidence to refute Putin’s domestic misinformation campaign. He compared this to the Skripal poisoning in England where Putin has offered all sorts of denials and conspiracy theories to obfuscate an already overwhelmed populace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The evidence is right there in the affidavits and indictments bozo. What the hell do you think evidence is? Evidence comes into court in two ways: documents and witnesses. We have plenty of both here. 

 

I'm afraid if youre waiting for a fingerprint that shows Col. Mustard did it with a candlestick in the library, well this isn't that kind of case. 

 

 

Edited by Legaltitan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Legaltitan said:

The evidence is right there in the affidavits and indictments bozo. What the hell do you think evidence is? Evidence some into court in two ways: documents and witnesses. We have plenty of both here. 

 

I'm afraid if youre waiting for a fingerprint that shows Col. Mustard did it with a candlestick in the library, well this isn't that kind of case. 

 

 

Exactly what I expected from you... NOTHING!!! Why??? Because there is no "ACTUAL EVIDENCE"  only accusations...

 

Why do you think they're burying the indictments??? in other words sending them to the DOJ-NSD???

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, begooode said:

I just can’t deal with Thor’s bs anymore. Good news is he does more damage in his efforts to defend trump than I could ever do in attacking him.

That's because you can never answer the questions... Your responses go nowhere...

Link to post
Share on other sites

For example, on or about March 19, 2016, LUKASHEV and his co-conspirators created and sent a spearphishing email to the chairman of the Clinton Campaign. LUKASHEV used the account “john356gh” at an online service that abbreviated lengthy website addresses (referred to as a “URL-shortening service”). LUKASHEV used the account to mask a link contained in the spearphishing email, which directed the recipient to a GRU-created website. LUKASHEV altered the appearance of the sender email address in order to make it look like the email was a security notification from Google (a technique known as “spoofing”), instructing the user to change his password by clicking the embedded link. Those instructions were followed. On or about March 21, 2016, LUKASHEV, YERMAKOV, and their co-conspirators stole the contents of the chairman’s email account, which consisted of over 50,000 emails.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Starting on or about March 19, 2016, LUKASHEV and his co-conspirators sent spearphishing emails to the personal accounts of other individuals affiliated with Case 1:18-cr-00215-ABJ Document 1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 6 of 29 7 the Clinton Campaign, including its campaign manager and a senior foreign policy advisor. On or about March 25, 2016, LUKASHEV used the same john356gh account to mask additional links included in spearphishing emails sent to numerous individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign, including Victims 1 and 2. LUKASHEV sent these emails from the Russia-based email account [email protected] that he spoofed to appear to be from Google.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On or about March 28, 2016, YERMAKOV researched the names of Victims 1 and 2 and their association with Clinton on various social media sites. Through their spearphishing operations, LUKASHEV, YERMAKOV, and their co-conspirators successfully stole email credentials and thousands of emails from numerous individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign. Many of these stolen emails, including those from Victims 1 and 2, were later released by the Conspirators through DCLeaks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...