Jump to content

Trump Latest Theory


reo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Trump and his team no longer scream "nothing burger", they talk about spies and evidence being planted. Rudy pretty much said collusion with Russia wasn't a crime. The evidence is too great to deny so

The easiest way to get the Trump Suckers to believe anything is to convince them that Obama and/or Hillary are behind it. The right wing nuts will believe absolutely anything bad they hear about Obama

That damn Obama. How many Republicans did he convert?

Posted Images

48 minutes ago, Omar said:

What sucks is when republicans like Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller "conspire" to take down a Republican President. Damn democrats..

Wow. Obama was able to get Republicans to do his bidding. Damn that Muslim from Kenya.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Omar said:

What sucks is when republicans like Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller "conspire" to take down a Republican President. Damn democrats..

"If Mueller is registered today as a Republican, Democrat, or Independent, it is not clear. The last time this was known was in 2001."

Comey's wife and daughters are Democrats. He didnt vote in the last election he stated. He is hardly a Republican and if so, a never Trumper most probably. 

Not sure about Rosenstein. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LongTimeFan said:

"If Mueller is registered today as a Republican, Democrat, or Independent, it is not clear. The last time this was known was in 2001."

Comey's wife and daughters are Democrats. He didnt vote in the last election he stated. He is hardly a Republican and if so, a never Trumper most probably. 

Not sure about Rosenstein. 

Lol that's bc as the director of the FBI he had to be impartial. But hell, he's only 73. Maybe in the last few years he decided to switch?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎5‎/‎24‎/‎2018 at 5:17 AM, OILERMAN said:

Trump and his team no longer scream "nothing burger", they talk about spies and evidence being planted. Rudy pretty much said collusion with Russia wasn't a crime. The evidence is too great to deny so now they are going a different route 

So they had a meeting yesterday and all of Trump's allies got to look at the evidence the FBI had about the informant  aka the spy.

 

So where's the beef?  Does anyone really think that if there was anything there of substance, that the Trump allies wouldn't have released it or leaked it yet?  

 

Where is the evidence of a spy?  What aren't we hearing anything about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ctm said:

So they had a meeting yesterday and all of Trump's allies got to look at the evidence the FBI had about the informant  aka the spy.

 

So where's the beef?  Does anyone really think that if there was anything there of substance, that the Trump allies wouldn't have released it or leaked it yet?  

 

Where is the evidence of a spy?  What aren't we hearing anything about it?

So if there was something there it would be leaked? Why is that not the same standard for collusion/obstruction investigation by Meuller?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

So if there was something there it would be leaked? Why is that not the same standard for collusion/obstruction investigation by Meuller?

Because Mueller is a professional prosecutor which is different than a politician like Devin Nunes, et. al.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Soxcat said:

They know there was at least one spy, they even know who he is.  You must be pretty naïve or a total fool.

The spin now if the FBI was spying on the Russians through the Trump campaign (not really Trump, doing him a favor).  The absurdity is beyond ridiculous but the fact some of you still don't get it is amazing.

 

Liberals are like a rat in a huge box with a pin hole.  You ask them what the box is like they would say it is a big hole with sunlight. 

 

There is a big difference in a spy on the campaign and an informant in a counter-intelligence investigation, even though Trump tries to equate the two.

 

So republicans have seen the evidence.  Where is the evidence someone was spying on his campaign?  Silence from his allies and from Trump today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ctm said:

There is a big difference in a spy on the campaign and an informant in a counter-intelligence investigation, even though Trump tries to equate the two.

 

So republicans have seen the evidence.  Where is the evidence someone was spying on his campaign?  Silence from his allies and from Trump today.

So what is the big difference between those two? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

So what is the big difference between those two? 

There is no formal definition.  Not that it will change anything, but I'll leave this for your consumption.  

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/may/22/informants-infiltration-and-spying-some-definition/

 

 

Edited by Rogue
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...