Jump to content

How Trump Wins by Bashing the News Media


reo

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

“There is a risk that one third of the electorate will be isolated in an information loop of its own, where Trump becomes the major source of information about Trump, because independent sources are rejected on principle. That has already happened. An authoritarian system is up and running for a portion of the polity. Another way to say this is that before journalists log on in the morning, one third of their potential public is already gone.”

“There is a risk that journalists could do their job brilliantly, and it won’t really matter, because Trump supporters categorically reject it, Trump opponents already believed it, and the neither-nors aren’t paying close enough attention.”

 

https://politicalwire.com/2018/04/25/how-trump-wins-by-bashing-the-news-media/

 

This is a textbook example of how democracies fall. Some dictator wannabe gets a large portion of the electorate to completely dismiss the news media and gets their news directly from the guy in power while another large portion disengages.

 

Personally I think Trump has pissed off enough people that enough people are paying attention to fight it but it's still the biggest threat to the US in decades. The main problems right now against this will be voter suppression and the wild card of potential further Russian interference. The main saving grace there though is that I don't think the Russians really want Trump to get complete control as much as they want a weaker America.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It's disgusting and disheartening that so many politicians are putting party-before-country to allow this to happen.  I don't even know how to describe the Republicans that desire to stand against thi

I will say Cosby is getting a lot of negative press today. Media is so bias. Can't they balance it with equal amounts of positive news?   /sarcasm

Conservatives have been attacking the “liberal media” for decades. At least back to the Nixon days. They hate the media exposing them.   But back then people couldn’t just tune out the real

Conservatives have been attacking the “liberal media” for decades. At least back to the Nixon days. They hate the media exposing them.

 

But back then people couldn’t just tune out the real news and switch on right wing spin like Fox, Breitbart, Rush, etc and pretend it’s news. Nowadays conservatives are totally divorced from reality in many cases. They never pay attention to real news so they buy whatever the right wing propaganda arm is telling them hook line and sinker. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CreepingDeath said:

It's disgusting and disheartening that so many politicians are putting party-before-country to allow this to happen.  I don't even know how to describe the Republicans that desire to stand against this but choose to retire instead of fighting for the survival of the country's best interests.  It's an odd mix of bravery and cowardice.

I'm not sure how much of the GOP are alt-right, and I'm not sure how much of the alt-right are Qultists, but these people are dangerous.  They believe Trump is here not only to save America (the country's interests), but the world from Deep State Satanists.  They believe this was already happening before Trump won and Trump has been "in the know" for a long time.  Anyone and anything of any power or influence not in alignment with Trump is deep state.  They only listen to Trump and Q.  Any news sources, be it real or social media, are only discussed in terms of what Q has told them.   Dissent is regular people is written off as "normies" not awake yet, or deep state, or pawns of deep state.  

 

They believe, as much as they believe in anything, that they are right.  There is NOTHING Trump can do that Q can't reign them back in with "trust the plan".  Week in and week out, they believe the current one will be the storm!!!!   Only for nothing to happen.  It just turns into the next week.  You can see a few of them start to question it, only to be brought back in full support with more Q posts.  They believe Russia is on our side, fighting the Deep State.  They are completely okay with the military taking over the US, in fact at one point, it was part of "the plan".  Yet we're the "traitors".  Tux has already said Trump will disband the FBI.  Does anyone think if that happened Tux wouldn't be completely behind a 100% loyal to Trump as the replacement?  And we're the "american haters"?  

 

These people are as authoritarian as it gets, because they believe their worldview is correct.  Without question.  

 

Now, how many of these people are there?  I don't know, but more than I'm comfortable with.  

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You people are as foolish as they come... Your spin is back ass backward... Who is trying to end free speech --- who condones illegal immigrants voting --- who has been pitching a Russian narrative that has no evidence for working on 2 years --- the MSM is butt fucking you and you buy every word they tell you... let's see what happens when the IG report comes out and see who is actually the force behind the bs... As for now you can all soak in the swamp water you seem to enjoy...

 

What freaking lemmings... Can't you think for yourself?  :335_cloud_lightning:

 

I have a simple question for you --- if the MSM is so correct and forth coming --- when has anyone ever and I do mean ever received over 90% of negative news??? Over 90% and you don't think something is fishy about that? You would have to be completely blinded by TDS to not see that as very telling... 

 

To top it off it's the dems that voted a corrupt Hillary into running --- enjoy the fruits of your own causes... :335_cloud_lightning:

Edited by thor
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, thor said:

You people are as foolish as they come... Your spin is back ass backward... Who is trying to end free speech --- who condones illegal immigrants voting --- who has been pitching a Russian narrative that has no evidence for working on 2 years --- the MSM is butt fucking you and you buy every word they tell you... let's see what happens when the IG report comes out and see who is actually the force behind the bs... As for now you can all soak in the swamp water you seem to enjoy...

 

What freaking lemmings... Can't you think for yourself?  :335_cloud_lightning:

 

I have a simple question for you --- if the MSM is so correct and forth coming --- when has anyone ever and I do mean ever received over 90% of negative news??? Over 90% and you don't think something is fishy about that? You would have to be completely blinded by TDS to not see that as very telling... 

 

To top it off it's the dems that voted a corrupt Hillary into running --- enjoy the fruits of your own causes... :335_cloud_lightning:

Lmao @ you calling anyone a lemming. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, thor said:

You people are as foolish as they come... Your spin is back ass backward... Who is trying to end free speech --- who condones illegal immigrants voting --- who has been pitching a Russian narrative that has no evidence for working on 2 years --- the MSM is butt fucking you and you buy every word they tell you... let's see what happens when the IG report comes out and see who is actually the force behind the bs... As for now you can all soak in the swamp water you seem to enjoy...

 

What freaking lemmings... Can't you think for yourself?  :335_cloud_lightning:

 

I have a simple question for you --- if the MSM is so correct and forth coming --- when has anyone ever and I do mean ever received over 90% of negative news??? Over 90% and you don't think something is fishy about that? You would have to be completely blinded by TDS to not see that as very telling... 

 

To top it off it's the dems that voted a corrupt Hillary into running --- enjoy the fruits of your own causes... :335_cloud_lightning:

Charles Manson?

That trustfund guy who bought the rights to necessary-for-life medicine and then jack up the prices?

 

The thing is, if you do mostly shitty things, people are going to hear mostly shitty things about you.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CreepingDeath said:

Charles Manson?

That trustfund guy who bought the rights to necessary-for-life medicine and then jack up the prices?

 

The thing is, if you do mostly shitty things, people are going to hear mostly shitty things about you.  

My point exactly --- you're showing how freaking stupid your assessments are...  :335_cloud_lightning:

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

We reject BS accusations with no evidence and they say "journalists could do a bang up job, but Trump supporters still wont listen". Lmao

 

Find something with evidence backing it up, and you'll have our ears. Until then, try getting the next handful of jello to stick to the wall.

Provide evidence and the Trumpkins will cry like brats "fake news!" and "MSM" and the like.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, begooode said:

Keep fetching that water, all Trump needs is your unwavering loyalty!

 

Trey Gowdy’s advice to Trump’s legal team: If your client is innocent tell him to act like it,...

A dem quoting Trey Gowdy... hilarious... :335_cloud_lightning:

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, thor said:

A dem quoting Trey Gowdy... hilarious... :335_cloud_lightning:

Another waterboy ignoring the words of Trey Gowdy aka “the Benghazi cowboy” to attack the messenger,... hilarious,.. tell you what, you can take your pail and move to the front of the line, Sparky.  If you’re lucky, Trump will even rub your hair!  :cj2k:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Starkiller said:

Conservatives have been attacking the “liberal media” for decades. At least back to the Nixon days. They hate the media exposing them.

 

But back then people couldn’t just tune out the real news and switch on right wing spin like Fox, Breitbart, Rush, etc and pretend it’s news. Nowadays conservatives are totally divorced from reality in many cases. They never pay attention to real news so they buy whatever the right wing propaganda arm is telling them hook line and sinker. 

Conservatives have been attacking the liberal media for decades because they clearly have been biased.   The left would certainly do the same if the situation was reversed.    To make matters worse, you had libtards like yourself that refused to acknowledge the liberal bias despite the mountains of evidence.   It is a shock that people got fed up with the mainstream liberal media and don't listen to them anymore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Little Earl said:

Conservatives have been attacking the liberal media for decades because they clearly have been biased.   The left would certainly do the same if the situation was reversed.    To make matters worse, you had libtards like yourself that refused to acknowledge the liberal bias despite the mountains of evidence.   It is a shock that people got fed up with the mainstream liberal media and don't listen to them anymore?

No one said the propaganda started with Trump. He just took it farther down the course it was already going and took advantage of the situation. 

 

It's facts and science that have a liberal bias but instead of believing that you turn away from both.

 

He saw how willingly you'll believe lies bc of your distrust of the left that's been built over the past decade+.

Edited by reo
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Little Earl said:

Conservatives have been attacking the liberal media for decades because they clearly have been biased.   The left would certainly do the same if the situation was reversed.    To make matters worse, you had libtards like yourself that refused to acknowledge the liberal bias despite the mountains of evidence.   It is a shock that people got fed up with the mainstream liberal media and don't listen to them anymore?

Please provide specific examples of the kinds of bias that you are referring to as evidence.

 

Nixon called the mainstream media biased for their “attacks” on him, but they were generally right about him. Were they biased for reporting on Watergate? Were they biased for their reporting on Vietnam, which today is universally seen as a disaster? Were they biased on his handling of the economy, which caused major inflation? Were they biased about his support of pro-desegregation forces in the south, which was absolutely true? It simply isn’t bias to report negative things when there is a negative thing to report.

 

Do people have bias? Sure. Do different media sources have some level of bias coming from the top? Sure, to some extent, but in the case of most of the mainstream so-called liberal media it’s pretty minimal. Not remotely like the right wing bias of a Fox News.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...