ctm Posted February 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 There is a lot more evidence out there than media ads. What about the campaign rallies the Russians organized? Or the hacking of the state election systems? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said: But the part I'm sure you'd like to ignore, is the one that specifically shows how the Russians played both sides against each other. Yeah by back Bernie and Trump and then especially Trump vs Hillary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 Nothing worse that the delusions of the willfully ignorant. Carry on boys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted February 17, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said: He's talking strictly about the ads the Russians placed with facebook, what they consisted of, and the timing of them. Reading the article he links, we find that 56% of the ads the Russians ran on facebook were run post election. Those certainly can't be construed as trying to help anyone win. Then we find that 25% of the ads they submitted were never run at all, and were never seen by anyone. And the grand total of the ads only reached 10 million people. But the part I'm sure you'd like to ignore, is the one that specifically shows how the Russians played both sides against each other. Something that's still going on to this day. All this shows is that the Russians had multiple objectives which aren't mutually exclusive. Sew discord, support Trump, Bernie, Jill Stein and criticize Hillary. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 1 minute ago, ctm said: All this shows is that the Russians had multiple objectives which aren't mutually exclusive. Sew discord, support Trump, Bernie, Jill Stein and criticize Hillary. It does make the "Hillary colluded with Russia" line even more hilarious though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzTitan Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 2 hours ago, TitanDuckFan said: Go ahead Mr. SCIF, show us how to remotely hack a computer that's been taken offline. A few ways, actually! The obvious way is to hope some idiot attaches an infected USB device like Stuxnet. Otherwise, you can intercept some keyboard signals - including wired ones. https://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/eavesdrop-on-keyboards-wirelessly/ Or use the CPU fan to extract data: https://www.wired.com/2016/06/clever-attack-uses-sound-computers-fan-steal-data/ And of course Van Eck phreaking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcV6izFG3vQ But the easiest way is to probably get someone to do your bidding, i.e. an insider. reo, and Jamalisms 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btowner Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 41 minutes ago, reo said: It does make the "Hillary colluded with Russia" line even more hilarious though. I guess Uranium doesn't buy as much support as the Trump supporters would have us believe. reo, Mythos27, and Justafan 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 17, 2018 Report Share Posted February 17, 2018 11 minutes ago, TennesseeTuxedo said: Is that supposed to add something to the conversation or just trigger emotional responses as distractions? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 Justafan, and reo 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btowner Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 11 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: 7. Blame Obama Justafan, big2033, reo, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heyitsmeallen Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 Thought this was funny reading the indictment. Quote 77- On or about August 1 8, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators sent money via interstate wire to another real U.S. person recruited by the ORGANIZATION, using one of their false U.S. personas, to build a cage large enough to hold an actress depicting Clinton in a prison uniform. someone on Reddit found a pic. That fuck face driving that 4wheeler is Kyle Julin and he is far from a patriotic American. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted February 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 10 hours ago, OILERMAN said: Why isn’t Trump responding to this Russian attack? You won't get an answer from the Trump supporters about this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 1 minute ago, ctm said: You won't get an answer from the Trump supporters about this. I think we will get an answer, it will just be predictably moronic... ctm 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 (edited) 14 hours ago, TitanDuckFan said: Care to share? Sigh. Here's the link to all ongoing FEC litigation cases. The FEC complaint was filed by the campaign legal center. As you can see, there are two cases of ongoing litigation with them and neither one of them involves this case. Meaning it never made it to court and was only filed so that news outlets could report on it and make a big deal out of nothing. One of the other interesting things about is one of the ongoing litigation cases is them complaining that the FEC dismissed five of their former cases as being frivilous. It's currently being fought in court but on appeal as it was rejected at the lower level. https://transition.fec.gov/law/litigation_CCA_Alpha.shtml#C Edited February 18, 2018 by Justafan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 33 minutes ago, Titansgoodluckcharm said: Hillary literally OWNED the DNC and didn't disclose it EVER. But wants to talk about Russia? Some of you Democrats need to get your head checked Clinton bailed the DNC out after they went into an election year 25 million in debt. She raised money for them and exerted that influence to her advantage. That's not the same as owning the DNC and people act like this is the first time something like this has happened when in fact, it's a common arrangement between party HQ and presidential candidates. Shultz was the real problem there, not Clinton. And as for Bernie, he no reason to work with the DNC and the DNC had no reason to work with him. It's also pretty clear the Russians wanted to damage Clinton and one of the best ways to do that was to strengthen her primary opponent. Starkiller 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.