reo Posted November 14, 2017 Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/360292-sessions-wed-need-factual-basis-for-second-special-counsel-for Quote It would take "a factual basis that meets the standard of a special counsel" for the Justice Department to make such an appointment, he said during a heated exchange with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) at a Tuesday House Judiciary Committee meeting. "We will use the proper standards and that’s the only thing I can tell you, Mr. Jordan," Sessions said. "You can have your idea but sometimes we have to study what the facts are and to evaluate whether it meets the standards it requires." Quote "That’s what it looks like and I’m asking you, in addition to all the things we know about James Comey in 2016, doesn’t that warrant naming a second special counsel?" he said. "I would say 'looks like' is not enough basis to appoint a special counsel," he said sharply. Didn't think i'd say this but good job Sessions. TitansGuru, MadMax, and Justafan 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanjuicy Posted November 14, 2017 Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 I have to say that I am very surprised that someone in this administration knows the difference between looks like and facts. I will say that if Jim Jordan or anyone else finds enough sufficient facts to warrant a special counsel, go get her. I have no problem with that. Justafan, reo, and Mythos27 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted November 14, 2017 Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 They'd make absolute fools of themselves if they launched an investigation. It's one thing to talk about it to the retards watching fox but a real investigation is another matter. TitansGuru, Justafan, and thor 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzTitan Posted November 14, 2017 Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 "sometimes we have to study what the facts are". "sometimes". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thor Posted November 14, 2017 Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 hours ago, OILERMAN said: They'd make absolute fools of themselves if they launched an investigation. It's one thing to talk about it to the retards watching fox but a real investigation is another matter. There's already an investigation underway... What they haven't decided s whether a "special council" is needed or not... Republicans don't need to rig stuff and create false stories... The dems screw the pooch all on their own... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted November 14, 2017 Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 hours ago, thor said: There's already an investigation underway... What they haven't decided s whether a "special council" is needed or not... Republicans don't need to rig stuff and create false stories... The dems screw the pooch all on their own... True. That’s Hannity & Fox's job. #teamwork!! reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Justafan Posted November 14, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 So let me get this straight. Dems fabricate a story with no evidence and get the justice department and Congress and the FBI to all launch investigations and appoint a special counsel that has indicted 2 people and secured the guilty plea of a 3rd - Rigged stuff and created false stories... Meanwhile, the Republicans try to do the same thing against Clinton when they control Congress, the Justice Department is run by a conservative, and the FBI director was also appointed by the administration and the reply has consistently been not enough evidence to warrant further action - Not rigged, totally true factual accounts..... Did I get it about right? Pragidealist, pat, Starkiller, and 10 others 13 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Downtown Posted November 14, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 14, 2017 Damn. @Justafan just bitch slapped @thor in the most gentle way possible. MadMax, thor, Titanjuicy, and 5 others 4 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thor Posted November 15, 2017 Report Share Posted November 15, 2017 6 hours ago, Downtown said: Damn. @Justafan just bitch slapped @thor in the most gentle way possible. That pretty much shows dems mentality --- hence the word "rigged" --- what dumb asses ... That deserves "3 Trumps"... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted November 15, 2017 Report Share Posted November 15, 2017 Refuge of the defeated. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post OILERMAN Posted November 15, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 15, 2017 "I saw a former prosecutor that worked with the FBI getting interviewed about Session not appointing a special council on Hillary and the uranium Russian deal. Pretty simple, the deal was totally legal and approved with a 9 person panel. The money given to the Clinton Foundation from the owner of company that had the uranium was before she was Sec of State and at the time of the deal he had already sold the company. No connection. Hillary didn't have the ability to approve the deal. The 9 person panel said they would still do the deal today. He also said when the movie "Clinton cash" was released the FBI looked deeply into the Clinton Foundation and there was nothing illegal they could find. This is what a true "Nothing burger" looks like thor, reo, Starkiller, and 6 others 8 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rogue Posted November 15, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 15, 2017 7 hours ago, thor said: That pretty much shows dems mentality --- hence the word "rigged" --- what dumb asses ... That deserves "3 Trumps"... It shows someone is a dumb ass for sure. reo, thor, Justafan, and 2 others 3 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted November 15, 2017 Report Share Posted November 15, 2017 The Repubs brought it up to ensure Fox had some clips to show their audience instead of just seeing Sessions tripping over his 5 hour "don't recollect" retreat. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thor Posted November 15, 2017 Report Share Posted November 15, 2017 The "Where's Waldo" contingent still counting on false innuendos and make believe lies... Of course there doesn't need to be a special council --- unlike the dems ---- where lies and corruption rule the roost... I would rather have Gowdy looking into the possible criminal actions first... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted November 16, 2017 Report Share Posted November 16, 2017 10 hours ago, thor said: The "Where's Waldo" contingent still counting on false innuendos and make believe lies... Of course there doesn't need to be a special council --- unlike the dems ---- where lies and corruption rule the roost... I would rather have Gowdy looking into the possible criminal actions first... It was a conservative Justice department that appointed the special counsel.... mostly because they felt they had little choice in the face of compelling evidence. Why don't they do the same thing with Hillary Clinton if the evidence is so compelling? Are you now suggesting that Jeff Sessions is a lying Democrat too? I mean don't these guys watch Fox? Haven't they read that book Clinton Cash? With all this "evidence" why in the world can't they get any traction with the justice department or the FBI to launch a real investigation when their appointed people are now in charge over there? Is everyone just sticking it to the Republicans these days? How many investigations have senators launched against Hillary Clinton? How many of those have come back with a shred of anything? Ask yourself what is the more likely answer as to why they keep doing it. That they truly believe that Clinton is guilty and they want to see justice prevail (you know because they are all shining examples of moral conduct) OR they have something to gain politically. Hillary might have done some shady stuff while she was in office. I honestly have no idea. What I do know, is that if the Republicans had a SHRED of credible proof there would be a huge investigation right now to distract from Mueller hauling people off to jail. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.