MIKE75 Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 (edited) I've seen Buffalo a few times,Cleveland mentioned once or twice,Kansas City could be a surprise destination..... So where do you think he could end up landing? Edited February 20, 2017 by MIKE75 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtenn Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 I am thinking the Bears. Maybe even with pick #3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 I think Clev may have to look at him at 12 and they could trade up if he falls further. I dont see him getting passed by KC in round one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 I like the kid a lot and not sure why people are down on him. I think he is going to make a good pro- QB. mmmmmbeeer, popa, and Huston 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 Not sure how his pro-comparison is Mariota but if any team actually thinks that, they would gladly trade into the top 10 for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 Best qb in the draft hands down, I expect his stock to go up. No way he makes it out of the top 10. Soxcat 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Starkiller Posted February 20, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 Someone who trades up to #5... wtenn, LOhunter, Omar, and 6 others 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Righteous Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 San Francisco TitanDuckFan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 Cleveland at 12. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnoxTitan Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 I think 18 could be a good spot for us. Watson's going to be like Bridgewater - they're going to start to pick the hell out of him come combine and workout days, and he'll drop. I don't think he'll drop into the 2nd though like TB. Somewhere around 18, QB needy teams at the top of the 2nd and those late 1st teams that want to develop a QB (Texans, KC?) are going to start eyeing each other wondering if they should jump up ahead of one another. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 18 minutes ago, KnoxTitan said: I think 18 could be a good spot for us. Watson's going to be like Bridgewater - they're going to start to pick the hell out of him come combine and workout days, and he'll drop. I don't think he'll drop into the 2nd though like TB. Somewhere around 18, QB needy teams at the top of the 2nd and those late 1st teams that want to develop a QB (Texans, KC?) are going to start eyeing each other wondering if they should jump up ahead of one another. If this KC talk is real then they are idiots for letting it slip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titansfan Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 I think Cleveland ultimately moves up into the top 8 to take him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, titansfan said: I think Cleveland ultimately moves up into the top 8 to take him I know I am probably in the minority but if they are going to do that, they should take him with #1. QB is too important of a position to take a chance. If they feel it is worth trading up they are obviously sold on him. I personally don't see him that way but if you truly are sold on him you have to take him at 1 and not worry about "value". MIKE75, abenjami, Dmeade-, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said: I know I am probably in the minority but if they are going to do that, they should take him with #1. QB is too important of a position to take a chance. If they feel it is worth trading up they are obviously sold on him. I personally don't see him that way but if you truly are sold on him you have to take him at 1 and not worry about "value". Agreed. If you think a QB is worth a top 5 pick then you don't mess around. You just take him. Otherwise some other team can easily snag him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaltitan Posted February 20, 2017 Report Share Posted February 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Huston said: If this KC talk is real then they are idiots for letting it slip. I remember when the Skins traded up in 05 a couple weeks before the draft and everyone knew it was for Jason Campbell. I remember thinking that was dumb because why would telegraph a move like that a few weeks before the draft instead of making the move while on the clock. In the end, they did get Campbell. Unfortunately for them, the player picked one spot ahead of them was Aaron Rodgers pat, and Huston 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.