BeedoeLaw Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 @THE_TITAN @TitanDuckFan please watch this game film of Jamal Adams vs wisconsin and tell me how it is better than Malike Hooker's film against the same wisconsin team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted January 6, 2017 Report Share Posted January 6, 2017 What's your point? Do you think Adams gets burned more than Hooker? Hooker is a FS, Adams is a SS, that plays a lot as a hybrid LB type. But even so, Hooker is either late or gets burned a number of times when he's supposed to be providing help over the top. More than Adams does. I like Byard in our FS role, and grabbing someone more suited to SS in the draft. It's that simple. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeedoeLaw Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 8 hours ago, TitanDuckFan said: What's your point? Do you think Adams gets burned more than Hooker? Hooker is a FS, Adams is a SS, that plays a lot as a hybrid LB type. But even so, Hooker is either late or gets burned a number of times when he's supposed to be providing help over the top. More than Adams does. I like Byard in our FS role, and grabbing someone more suited to SS in the draft. It's that simple. My point is that I see a lot of the same issues with Adams' film as you and @THE_TITAN see with Hooker's film. Missed tackles and coverage issues. My point is if you wouldn't take Hooker at 5 because of these issues, it seems to me like you wouldn't want Adams either. I like them both. I probably prefer Hooker more because of his speed and ball skills, but I wouldn't mind if either of them were the pick at 5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 10 minutes ago, BeedoeLaw said: My point is that I see a lot of the same issues with Adams' film as you and @THE_TITAN see with Hooker's film. Missed tackles and coverage issues. My point is if you wouldn't take Hooker at 5 because of these issues, it seems to me like you wouldn't want Adams either. I like them both. I probably prefer Hooker more because of his speed and ball skills, but I wouldn't mind if either of them were the pick at 5. Neither played a perfect game against Wisky, I get that. But that isn't a factor for me. Again, you're missing my point. It's not about Hooker vs Adams for the FS position. It's about Hooker vs Byard @Free Safety. I don't believe Hooker is a better FS than Byard. And I believe Adams is (will be) a better Strong Safety than either Byard or Hooker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE_TITAN Posted January 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 (edited) I don't think either Hooker or Adams will be the BPA for us if we stick at #5. Adams is more pro-ready but Hooker has better range and a higher ceiling. Hooker will end up predominantly a FS and Adams predominantly a SS - but safeties generally have to be able to switch in to either role for the most part nowadays (unless you have a straight thumper playing the strong role). Edited January 7, 2017 by THE_TITAN Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.