Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

PODCAST Episode 70 - Stick a Fork in 'Em

24 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Another week and another loss for the lowly Tennessee Titans. Despite a heroic comeback, the Titans fell short of a win against the Cardinals. Jonboy and Jamal recap the loss and breakdown all the other news surrounding the Titans including Tommy Smith's press conference, the benching of Zach Brown, and a new quarterback signing. They also discuss Mike Munchak's future and one member of the Two Tone Crew evens goes as far to say that Munch is done in Tennessee. A quick preview of the Jags and upset picks close out the show.

 

http://traffic.libsyn.com/twotonecrew/Episode_70.output.mp3

 
iTunes
 
RSS:
 
Voicemail:
(615) 900-0282
 
Mailbag:
[email protected]
 
Facebook:
 
Twitter:
@titansreport

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

@Jamalisms

I noticed you failed to mention that no one is defending Brown's play. I also noticed how you left out the fact his stats are much better than Ayers or the combination of Fokou and McCarthy. He has the most tackles per play (rare for a WLB), sacks on less rushing attempts, and pics with less snaps. You discussed the fact the whole group has underperformed, yet said nothing about how no one else has been called out. That is the issue and not just the benching. No one is saying he's played well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Defending Brown and saying his benching is unwarranted/wrong are literally inseparable.

Are the other players being benched for not playing within the defense? No. Have we heard that this is an issue with them? No. Is there reason to suspect it beyond a desire to defend Brown's conduct? No. Is Brown playing will enough when not playing within the defense to excuse his not playing within the defense? No. Has Brown earned the benefit of the doubt? No. Is he good enough that the defensive staff should just let him do what he wants? No. Should a defensive staff be able to expect players to do as they are instructed? Yes.

If a player makes a tackle does that mean he shouldn't have been in better position to make the tackle earlier (and/or prevent the catch)? No.

These objections are almost all complete red herrings as far as I'm concerned. Is he doing what he is supposed to? If the answer is no (which it is) and the defensive staff tells him to stop and he doesn't, go sit on the bench. End of story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I don't believe Brown was benched due to performance. It has everything to do with his attitude in response to the coaches telling him he's not playing the way they want him to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yes, let's ignore all of the relevant stats once again.

Are you denying he's been the best LB on the field?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yes, let's ignore all of the relevant stats once again.

Are you denying he's been the best LB on the field?

Who are you addressing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

For "nobody defending his play," there's an awful lot of trying to discuss stats and comparisons to other players. Strange.

By all accounts he has been benched for not playing within the defense. It's the nature, not the quality.

The issue isn't ignoring stats. It's ignoring the actual issue by trying to defend his play with stats... all the while saying you aren't defending his play, which is bizarre.

Play as you are instructed or gtfo. Welcome to sports at any level. Meanwhile the guy is making stuff up about not knowing what's going on and talking about auditioning for other teams. The guy needs to get his head screwed back on. Until then he is the problem.

Why someone wants to defend that is beyond me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Using stats to show one player is better than the others isn't defending the player when you've already stated, several times now, that he's sucked for most of the year. So, you can get over that, because it's not the case.

Also, how bad does it make our coaching look when the guy with the best stats of any LB is the one saying fuck the coaches terrible system? I'm right about this, even if you are, as well. He shouldn't be freelancing, but he's outplaying the other guys who apparently aren't in every major statistic that matters for a LB. Why are the other LBs not being called out? Just because they've kept their mouth shut and sucked inside of this terrible system without freelancing? Yep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

ILS you are confusing a bad staff/system with blatent insubordination. Forget about Ayers and Fokou. They are irrelevant to this discussion.

Edited by oldschool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

ILS you are confusing a bad staff/system with blatent insubordination. Forget about Ayers and Fokou. They are irrelevant to this discussion.

Ding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Meh, like I said, he's been the best backer on the field. That is indisputable.

Of course it's insubordination. I still think the situation is bullshit, because no one else is being taken to account for their terrible play. The reason that is, is because it would then point the finger back at the rightful owners of the LB debacle: the coaches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Meh, like I said, he's been the best backer on the field. That is indisputable.

Of course it's insubordination. I still think the situation is bullshit, because no one else is being taken to account for their terrible play. The reason that is, is because it would then point the finger back at the rightful owners of the LB debacle: the coaches.

Still missing the point. For arguments sake lets say Ayers/Fokou/McCarthy are all responding to coaching and acknowledging where they need to improve. Now let's say Brown is unwilling to do the same despite his poor play, even if it's better than the othe lbs, and is being vocal about it. It's easy to understand why he was benched. It still seems petty to me but it's acceptable at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

My friend, it gets tiring when you say that first line so often. I'm not missing either of your points. Both are valid. My points are as well. This debacle lies at the feet of the coaches. The other players aren't being called out for playing worse than the guy freelancing, because if the coaches admit every single linebacker we have is underwhelming, then well, what happens? Oh yeah, it gets laid at the feet of the coaches, which is my point.

I'm done arguing about this. I don't have a problem with the benching. I have a problem with the entire LB core sucking and not being held accountable because our coaches are hanging on by a thread and can't admit they've failed, which would be the case if they were to call out the terrible play of the other backers. Seeing as Chet was Munchak's old college buddy roommate, I'd say my points are valid that Brown's play is being scapegoated for the LB core's problems. Munchak didn't only talk about him freelancing, he talked about how his level of play hasn't been acceptable...well if that's the case, then obviously it should apply to the others. Not sure how there is an argument against that. If Munchak comes out and says "he wasn't following orders so we benched him" then fine. He didn't. He directly called out his play, which has statistically been better than the other LBs by a fairly wide margin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.